$330 → $0.05
Cost to ask one everyday question 1,000 times — today versus with Tessallite.
Governed analytics, at near-zero cost
Tessallite answers the questions your business repeats every day — in Excel, Power BI, the API and the agent — from a tiny maintained summary instead of re-reading the whole terabyte. On a full terabyte of industry-standard data (TPC-DS, 2.88 billion sales records), that turns hundreds of dollars per thousand runs into a few cents, with the identical answer.
A team running 40 dashboards refreshed hourly asks these questions ~350,000 times a year — about $116,000 in BigQuery scan today, about $18 with Tessallite. Same answers, every tool.
Measured results — SF1000 on BigQuery
Four everyday questions, asked the normal way (raw BigQuery) and with Tessallite, on a ~1 TB workload. Every accelerated answer was checked against the raw source and matched.
$330 → $0.05
Cost to ask one everyday question 1,000 times — today versus with Tessallite.
66 GB → a few KB
Data scanned to answer it — the same answer from a tiny maintained summary.
4 / 4 identical
Every accelerated answer matched the raw-source answer, within tolerance.
BigQuery on-demand cost (~$5/TB, 10 MB minimum per query) for three everyday questions — from a simple one to a heavy one — today (raw BigQuery, each time) versus with Tessallite.
Gigabytes scanned for the same three questions — raw BigQuery versus the maintained summary Tessallite reads instead.
With acceleration on, every question was answered from a maintained summary; with it off, from the raw source — and all four answers were identical.
Methodology
The benchmark measures a curated set of buyer-relevant analytical questions mapped to a semantic model, against direct BigQuery baselines and Tessallite's source and aggregate routes. Want to run it on your own data? Follow the TPC-DS evaluation guide.
The data source is a TPC-DS-derived SF1000 retail analytics dataset loaded into BigQuery. BigQuery remains the source execution engine; Tessallite provides governed modelling, protocol access, route selection, and transparent acceleration.
Published runs will identify cache policy, compute model, BigQuery region, query count, run count, warmup discard policy, Tessallite version, model version, and seeded acceleration state.
Each accelerated answer is compared back to the raw BigQuery result and must match within a stated tolerance before it counts.
What we measured
Every number on this page is measured on the live terabyte and tied back to the run records linked below.
Named sets, aggregates, and pockets
The same governed question moves through source and aggregate routes while named sets keep business filters reusable across agent, Excel, BI, and API access — one definition, one answer, everywhere.
Curated questions execute against BigQuery through the governed source route, and we confirm the answer first.
Recurring analytical patterns route to maintained aggregates seeded from the semantic model and reported with route explanations.
Exact executive dashboards, such as CFO weekly revenue, can route to pockets with freshness metadata and lineage visible.
Saved business lists, such as high-value customers or strategic categories, are governed objects rather than copied spreadsheet filters.
The numbers in full
The full report covers all 17 business questions, the method, and the cost translation. The raw run records and byte matrix are here too, so anyone can check the figures for themselves.
Evidence manifest pending.
See how governed acceleration cuts your BigQuery bill on the questions your teams ask every day.